2nd volume of the International Journal of Marketing Semiotics

1_FRONT final_vol II 2014

www.ijmarketingsemiotics.com

http://ijmarketingsemiotics.com/journal-contents-2/

 

PRESS RELEASE: LAUNCH OF THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKETING SEMIOTICS (IJMS) VOL.II

We are pleased to announce the launch of the second issue of the International Journal of Marketing Semiotics.

Almost three years have elapsed since the official release of the International Journal of Marketing Semiotics. During this period we have witnessed an increasing interest in multidisciplinary research between marketing and semiotics from scholars whose primary affiliation rests with either side of this far from irreconcilable divide. Admittedly the unique territory that the International Journal of Marketing Semiotics has been consistently trying to consolidate, at the intersection between marketing and semiotic research, has proven to be a demanding task. Occasionally novel brand propositions that are born in the centre of Venn diagrams are burdened with the vagaries of the ‘stuck in the middle’ phenomenon. Thankfully this has not been the case with marketing semiotics thus far. This is also confirmed by the significantly greater number of marketing semiotic submissions to the 12th World Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies compared to 2011.  In line with our vision and mission statement of furthering the discipline, we are particularly glad to bring you the second volume of the International Journal of Marketing Semiotics.

The issue opens with an innovative contribution by Angela Bargenda in the field of what might be called (given that this is a nascent research field) architectural brand semiotics (not to be confused with the standard term brand architecture in branding research). The article addresses a significant opportunity gap in the traditional conceptualization of brand identity concerning the contribution of architectural aesthetics in the construal of an overall customer experience with a focus on the branding of financial services’ retail outlets. Bargenda’s semiotic analysis demonstrates how olfactory, spatial, optical, auditory, gustative and tactile signs function synesthetically with view to engendering a multi-sensory brand universe that gives rise to a distinctive corporate personality. At the same time, the analysis demonstrates lucidly how architectural branding elements attain to harmonize the spatial experience with a wider socioeconomic and cultural framework, thus transforming mundane financial exchanges into symbolic and cultural capital. Furthermore, by incorporating a multimodal rhetorical analysis in the wider semiotic framework the author points to how architectural branding elements attain to balance the background, functional expectancies from a banking retail outlet with the aesthetic requirements that are part and parcel and at the same time enriching of a unique urban environment.  The managerial implications are highlighted with respect to the increasing economic importance of aesthetics in the generation of symbolic capital for financial services and semiotics as a potent methodical roadmap for achieving superior benefits to this end.

The second article, by George Rossolatos, aims at laying the foundations of a cultural branding model that is edified largely against the background of Lotmanian semiotics. Despite the fact that cultural branding, from a marketing literature point of view, by now constitutes an entrenched research field in the wider CCT stream, no cultural branding models have been furnished in marketing semiotics. While recognizing the considerable theoretical and practical benefits that may be reaped by capitalizing on the conceptual richness of Lotman’s prolific writings on textual/cultural semiotics, the author puts forward the model of the brandosphere, as the branding equivalent of the seminal concept of the semiosphere. By placing relevant concepts from the vast Lotmanian cultural semiotic inventory in a branding context, with an emphasis on the notions of cultural centre vs. periphery, levels and units of semiotic analysis, semiotic modeling, among others, an attempt is made to integrate insights that were borne out mainly through Lotman’s engagement with literary texts (and to a lesser extent with cinematic ones) in a set of concrete guidelines and research directions. The model of the brandosphere is in line with the author’s consistent attempts at laying bare the scholarly contributions that may be made in the extant literature by adopting a wider brand textuality perspective, amidst an intellectual climate that has been increasingly preoccupied with arguing for the textual constitution of cultural identity. As an attestation of the massive opportunities in terms of the empirical applications of the brandosphere the paper focuses on the nascent research field of user generated advertising. The pursued argumentation is intent on demonstrating the benefits that may stem for account planning and brand management while attending to how brand discourses are textually co-conditioned (rather than co-created), an analytical output that is expected to emerge on multiple levels by comparing and contrasting brand initiated with user generated advertising. Ultimately, the brandosphere is intended as a model for managing a brand’s share of cultural representations, in complementarity to a brand’s market share, which is mandated even more forcefully in an economy that is progressively driven by intangible benefits and values.

The ensuing contribution by Richard Tressider explores how the language of hospitality is shaped in contemporary marketing communications. By adopting a social semiotic conceptual framework for mapping the social and cultural significance of hospitality, while drawing on the multimodal discourse of three restaurant websites, the author demonstrates how consumer experiences and anticipated benefits that are related to hospitality are shaped and conditioned by brand discourses. In essence the consumption of a hospitality experience is incumbent on a sign-economy or, as the author puts it, by vectors that connect consumers with texts.  While deconstructing the language of hospitality Tressider demonstrates how the gustative code relates to wider cultural codes, but also, how the aesthetics of taste (gustative or otherwise) cohere with and are reflective of socioeconomic structures. Moreover, the analysis unearths the inextricable relationship between product and service aspects that are integral to the brand promise of the scrutinized restaurant websites which are edified, in turn, on mythical and iconic codes. The implications of this semiotic reading are extended to encompass how meaning is guided or signposted by a set of visual and textual marketing conventions that are invested with exchanges of cultural capital and expressions of identity, reaching up to sacral dimensions.The second article, by George Rossolatos, aims at laying the foundations of a cultural branding model that is edified largely against the background of Lotmanian semiotics. Despite the fact that cultural branding, from a marketing literature point of view, by now constitutes an entrenched research field in the wider CCT stream, no cultural branding models have been furnished in marketing semiotics. While recognizing the considerable theoretical and practical benefits that may be reaped by capitalizing on the conceptual richness of Lotman’s prolific writings on textual/cultural semiotics, the author puts forward the model of the brandosphere, as the branding equivalent of the seminal concept of the semiosphere. By placing relevant concepts from the vast Lotmanian cultural semiotic inventory in a branding context, with an emphasis on the notions of cultural centre vs. periphery, levels and units of semiotic analysis, semiotic modeling, among others, an attempt is made to integrate insights that were borne out mainly through Lotman’s engagement with literary texts (and to a lesser extent with cinematic ones) in a set of concrete guidelines and research directions. The model of the brandosphere is in line with the author’s consistent attempts at laying bare the scholarly contributions that may be made in the extant literature by adopting a wider brand textuality perspective, amidst an intellectual climate that has been increasingly preoccupied with arguing for the textual constitution of cultural identity. As an attestation of the massive opportunities in terms of the empirical applications of the brandosphere the paper focuses on the nascent research field of user generated advertising. The pursued argumentation is intent on demonstrating the benefits that may stem for account planning and brand management while attending to how brand discourses are textually co-conditioned (rather than co-created), an analytical output that is expected to emerge on multiple levels by comparing and contrasting brand initiated with user generated advertising. Ultimately, the brandosphere is intended as a model for managing a brand’s share of cultural representations, in complementarity to a brand’s market share, which is mandated even more forcefully in an economy that is progressively driven by intangible benefits and values.

The volume concludes with a dual Peircean, structuralist reading of a single Nutribalance print ad by Sharon Schembri and Eliane Karsaklian. By singling out which ad expressive elements are central, from an enunciator’s point of view, in conveying intended brand meaning, the authors report findings from primary qualitative research that are suggestive of two interpretive avenues whereby consumers either align their take-out of the concerned ad with the brand owners’ intentions or ‘miss the point’ altogether. The benefits of combining semiotically informed research frameworks for answering the same research questions in terms of enhancing credibility are highlighted, while the significance of semiotics for applied advertising research is stressed in terms of furnishing robust interpretive frameworks for systematically segmenting and methodically portraying consumer narratives.

 

CALL FOR PAPERS IJMS VOL.III

If you are an academic researcher or an agency in the field of marketing semiotics and you wish to contribute to the International Journal of Marketing Semiotics, please send your papers to:

journalmarketingsemiotics@yahoo.com

georgerossolatos123@gmail.com

The closing date for submission is May 30th 2015

For further details visit http://ijmarketingsemiotics.com/call-for-papers/

CFP: Lexia n. 19

Lexia n. 19: Food and Cultural Identity

Lexia n. 19: Cibo e identità culturale

Lexia n. 19: Alimentation et identité culturelle

Lexia n. 19: Comida e identidad cultural

Download PDF: Lexia n. 19 Call for Papers

Lexia, the international, peer-reviewed journal of CIRCE, the Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Communication of the University of Torino, Italy, invites contributions to be published in issue n. 19.

Lexia, la rivista internazionale peer-reviewed di CIRCE, il Centro Interdipartimentale di Ricerche sulla Comunicazione dell’Università di Torino, sollecita contributi da pubblicare nel n. 19.

Lexia, le journal international peer-reviewed de CIRCE, le Centre Interdépartemental de Recherche sur la Communication de l’Université de Torino, Italie, invite des soumissions d’articles à publier dans le n. 19.

Lexia, la revista internacional peer-rewieved de CIRCE, el Centro Interdepartamental de Búsqueda sobre la Comunicación de la Universidad de Torino, Italia, invita artículos a publicar en el n. 19.

 

The topic of the forthcoming issue is “Food and Cultural Identity”.

L’argomento del prossimo numero è “Cibo e identità culturale”.

Le sujet du prochain numéro est « Nourriture et identité culturelle ».

El tópico del próximo número es el siguiente: “Comida e identidad cultural”.

 

“Tell me what you eat, and I will tell you who you are”. From the numerous cooking blogs inhabiting the Internet to modern treatises on taste, this aphorism by Brillat-Savarin (1825) has become very famous and omnipresent. Over time, moreover, such formula has acquired different connotations with respect to the acceptation introduced by the French scholar in The Physiology of Taste. Taken adequate distance from any kind of determinism, it is still extremely topical in its references to the issue of the relation between food and identity.

Lexia calls for a reflection on the links existing between the signs, texts, discourses, and practices concerning the gastronomic universe, on the one hand, and the processes of construction and the forms of expression of cultural identity — or, better, identities — on the other hand.

Specifically, contributors are invited to take into consideration the following topics:

1) “E(A)T-HNIC” IDENTITIES. According to Lévi-Strauss (1965), the cooking of a society is a language in which it unconsciously translates its structure. The gastronomic universe therefore needs to be conceived and analysed as the depository of groups’ traditions and identities. As such, food represents the first way to come into contact with different identities and cultures, especially in the contemporary world, which is characterised by a number of encounters, intersections, and contaminations. How can different “foodspheres” be conceived and examined? Which signs, discourses, and practices characterise them? And which forms of textuality are deposited by such processes? Finally, how do the processes of “translation” across different foodspheres take place?

2) FOOD AND RELIGIOUS IDENTITY. The food universe plays a crucial role with respect to religious identity: from food taboos to the offerings of various products to the gods, from the Eucharist host to the Vedic yajña, from the periods of fasting to the episodes described in different sacred texts, religion is full of signs, texts, and practices in which food plays a key role. How does the food-material emerge as a religious sign? Which rituals and practices are related to such processes? What are the effects of meaning arising from them? And how can semiotics describe such phenomena?

3) FOOD BETWEEN LANGUAGE AND COMMUNICATION. Cooking, and more generally food, are often compared to language and communication. From an anthropological perspective, nutrition is undoubtedly the first human need; however, once satisfied, this need is structured into a system of differences in signification (Barthes 1961). How is such a language structured? What are its forms of expression? Finally, how have these aspects changed over time? And which configurations have they come to assume in the contemporary world, which is characterised by numerous migratory flows and displacements, as well as by the advent of the so-called “food globalisation”?  In addition to the analysis of food as a language and a system of communication, it is very interesting to consider the languages and forms of communication related to the food universe: from cinema to arts, from wine and food tasting to cooking blogs, from photography to fashion and design, food is at the centre of many discourses that tell and analyse it, at the same time investing it with multiple values and inserting it in multiform narrative programs. What are the traces left by such discourses? And how do these processes affect our perception of reality? Finally, what are mass media capabilities with respect to the representation of food and taste, and especially of their cultural dimension?

 

These three areas of discussion are open not only to all semiotic perspectives, but also to the contributions of disciplines such as anthropology, sociology, or other branches of the so-called “food studies”. We shall particularly appreciate contributions capable of combining in-depth theoretic-methodological reflection (what it is the role of semiotics within such a field of research? How can the semiotic approach interact with other disciplines in order to facilitate the analysis of the above-mentioned issues?) with rigorous and heuristic analytical application to precise and detailed case studies.

 

 

“Dimmi cosa mangi e ti dirò chi sei”, recita un aforisma divenuto celebre e ormai onnipresente, dai numerosi blog di cucina ai moderni trattati sul gusto. Una formula che, nel tempo, ha assunto connotazioni diverse rispetto all’accezione introdotta da Brillat-Savarin in Fisiologia del gusto (1825) e che, prese le dovute distanze da ogni sorta di determinismo, continua a essere di estrema attualità nei suoi rimandi al tema del rapporto tra cibo e questioni identitarie.

Lexia invita a una riflessione sui legami tra i segni, i testi, i discorsi e le pratiche inerenti all’universo gastronomico, da un lato, e i processi di costruzione e le forme di espressione dell’identità culturale — o, meglio, delle identità culturali —, dall’altro.

In particolare, si sollecita l’invio di contributi che prendano in considerazione i seguenti nuclei tematici:

1) IDENTITÀ “E(A)T-NICHE”. Se nella cucina si traduce inconsciamente la struttura di una società, come ha messo in evidenza Lévi-Strauss (1965), l’universo gastronomico va analizzato in quanto depositario delle tradizioni e delle identità di gruppo. Strumento dell’identità culturale, il cibo si configura anche e soprattutto come luogo di incontro tra diverse identità e culture, tanto più in un mondo segnato da continui spostamenti, incroci e contaminazioni. Quali sono, dunque, le caratteristiche delle diverse “semiosfere alimentari”? Quali i segni, i discorsi e le pratiche che le caratterizzano? Quali le forme di testualità depositate da simili discorsi e pratiche? E in che modo avvengono i processi di traduzione tra una semiosfera alimentare e l’altra?

2) CIBO E IDENTITÀ RELIGIOSA. La sfera alimentare è di fondamentale importanza in relazione all’identità religiosa: dalle prescrizioni alimentari alle offerte di cibo alle divinità, dall’ostia eucaristica allo yajña vedico, dai periodi di digiuno agli episodi narrati dai testi sacri, la religione è intrisa di segni, testi e pratiche in cui il cibo gioca un ruolo fondamentale. In che modo la materia-cibo emerge come segno religioso? Quali sono i riti e le pratiche che accompagnano una simile trasformazione? Quali gli effetti di senso che ne scaturiscono? E in che modo la semiotica può rendere conto di simili processi?

3) IL CIBO TRA LINGUAGGIO E COMUNICAZIONE. La cucina, e più in generale l’alimentazione, sono state spesso paragonate al linguaggio e alla comunicazione: se dal punto di vista antropologico, la nutrizione rimane indubbiamente uno dei primi fabbisogni dell’umanità, non bisogna dimenticare che, una volta soddisfatto, tale bisogno si struttura articolandosi in un sistema di differenze significative (Barthes 1961). Quali sono, dunque, le caratteristiche proprie di un simile linguaggio? Quali le sue forme espressive? E, ancora, quali mutamenti hanno subìto questi aspetti nel tempo e quale configurazione sono venuti ad assumere nell’era contemporanea, caratterizzata da numerosi flussi migratori e dall’avvento della cosiddetta “globalizzazione alimentare”? Molto può dire, inoltre, l’analisi dei linguaggi e delle forme di comunicazione che riguardano l’universo alimentare: dal cinema alle più svariate forme artistiche, dalle degustazioni enogastronomiche ai blog di cucina, dalla fotografia alla moda e al design, il cibo è al centro di numerosi discorsi che lo analizzano e raccontano, investendolo di molteplici valori e inserendolo in programmi narrativi multiformi. Quali sono le tracce lasciate da simili discorsi? E in che modo simili processi influiscono sulla nostra percezione della realtà? Quali sono, infine, le potenzialità dei mezzi di comunicazione di massa nei confronti della rappresentazione del cibo e del gusto e, in particolare, della loro dimensione culturale?

 

Questi tre ambiti di riflessione sono aperti non solo a tutte le impostazioni semiotiche, ma anche agli apporti di discipline quali l’antropologia, la sociologia o altre branche afferenti ai cosiddetti “food studies”. Particolarmente apprezzati saranno i contributi in grado di unire una riflessione teorico-metodologica approfondita (qual è il ruolo della semiotica in tale ambito di studi? In che modo l’approccio semiotico può interagire con altre discipline al fine di favorire l’analisi delle problematiche sopra esposte?) con un’applicazione analitica rigorosa ed euristica a case studies precisi e dettagliati.

 

 

L’aphorisme « Dis-moi ce que tu manges, je te dirai qui tu es » est devenu célèbre et de plus en plus omniprésent : à partir des blogs de cuisine jusque dans nombreux traités modernes sur le goût. Cette formule, avec le temps, a pris des connotations différentes de l’acception introduite par Brillat-Savarin dans Physiologie du goût (1825) et — prise à une distance suffisante de toute forme de déterminisme — continue à être extrêmement d’actualité dans ses références sur le rapport entre alimentation et questions identitaires.

Lexia invite à une réflexion sur, d’un côté, les liens entre les signes, les textes, les discours et les pratiques concernant l’univers gastronomique, et de l’autre, le processus de construction et des formes d’expression de l’identité culturelle — ou, plutôt, des identités culturelles.

On conseille en particulier de porter l’attention sur les thématiques suivantes:

1) identités « E(A)T-hniques ». Si la cuisine traduit inconsciemment la structure d’une société, comme le dit Lévi-Strauss (1965), l’univers gastronomique doit être examiné en tant que dépositaire des traditions et de l’identité de groupe. Instrument de l’identité culturelle, la nourriture représente également (et surtout) un lieu de rencontre entre identités et cultures différentes, notamment dans un monde marqué par des déplacements constants, des hybridations et contaminations. Quelles sont, à cet égard, les caractéristiques des différentes « sémiosphères alimentaires » ? Quels sont les textes, discours et pratiques qui les caractérisent ? Quelles formes de textualité sont déposées par ces discours et pratiques ? Et comment les processus de traduction entre une sémiosphère alimentaire et l’autre ont lieu ?

2) NOURRITURE ET IDENTITE RELIGIEUSE. La nourriture est une sphère d’une importance fondamentale par rapport à l’identité religieuse: dès prescriptions alimentaires aux offrandes de nourriture aux dieux, de l’hôte de l’Eucharistie au yajña védique, dès périodes de jeûne aux épisodes racontés par les textes sacrés, la religion est pleine de signes, textes et de pratiques dans lesquels l’alimentation joue un rôle majeur. Comment la nourriture-matière émerge-t-elle comme signe religieux ? Quels sont les rituels et les pratiques qui accompagnent cette transformation ? Quels sont les effets de sens qu’elle apporte ? Et comment la sémiotique peut rendre compte de ces processus ?

3) NOURRITURE ENTRE LANGAGE ET COMMUNICATION. La cuisine, et plus généralement l’alimentation, ont souvent été comparées au langage et à la communication : il est vrai que, dans une perspective anthropologique, la nutrition est sans doute l’un des premiers besoins de l’humanité ; mais il est tout aussi vrai que, une fois satisfait, ce besoin est structuré dans un système de différences signifiantes. Quelles sont, en l’occurrence, les caractéristiques propres d’un tel langage ? Quelles sont ses formes d’expression ? Et encore, quels changements ont engendré ces aspects dans le temps et quelle configuration prennent-ils à l’époque contemporaine, caractérisée par de nombreux flux migratoires et l’avènement de ce que l’on appelle la globalisation alimentaire ? Il est très intéressant, d’ailleurs, de s’attacher à l’analyse des langages et des formes de communication qui font référence à l’univers alimentaire : du cinéma aux diverses formes d’art, dès dégustations eno-gastronomiques aux blogs de cuisine, de la photographie à la mode, la nourriture est au centre de nombreux discours qui l’analysent et la racontent, en l’investissant de multiples valeurs et en l’insérant dans des programmes narratifs multiformes. Quelles sont les traces laissées par de tels discours ? Et comment ces discours affectent-ils notre perception de la réalité ? Quelles sont, enfin, les potentialités des médias par rapport à la représentation de la nourriture et du goût — et, en particulier, de leur dimension culturelle ?

 

Ces trois sujets de discussion sont ouverts non seulement à tout point de vue sémiotique, mais aussi aux contributions d’autres disciplines comme l’anthropologie, la sociologie et les études sur l’alimentation. On appréciera particulièrement les contributions capables d’entretenir une réflexion théorique et méthodologique approfondie (de quelles façons la sémiotique peut-elle interagir avec ces disciplines afin de faciliter l’analyse des questions décrites ci-dessus ?) à une application analytique à la fois rigoureuse et heuristique de cas d’études précis et détaillés.

 

El aforismo “Dime lo que comes y te diré quién eres” se ha hecho famoso y casi omnipresente, desde los blogs de cocina hasta los muchos tratados modernos sobre el gusto. Se trata de una fórmula que, con el tiempo, ha asumido connotaciones diferentes respeto a la acepción introducida por Brillat-Savarin en Fisiología del gusto (1825) y que, tomada suficiente distancia de cualquier tipo de determinismo, sigue siendo de gran actualidad por sus referencias al tema de la relación entre comida y cuestiones identidarias.

Lexia invita a una reflexión sobre los vínculos entre las señales, los textos, los discursos y las prácticas relacionados con el universo gastronómico, por un lado, y sobre los procesos de construcción y las formas de expresión de la identidad cultural — o mejor dicho, de las identidades culturales — por otro.

En particular, se convoca a la presentación de artículos que propongan una reflexión sobre los siguientes temas:

1) IDENTIDADES “é(A)T-nicas”. Si en la cocina se traduce inconscientemente la estructura de una sociedad, como puso en evidencia Lévi-Strauss (1965), el universo gastronómico tiene que ser analizado como depositario de las tradiciones y de la identidad de grupo. Instrumento de la identidad cultural, la comida constituye también y, sobre todo, el lugar de encuentro entre las diferentes identidades y culturas, especialmente en un mundo marcado por constantes desplazamientos, cruces y contaminaciones. ¿Cuáles son, entonces, las características de las diferentes “semiosferas alimentarias”? ¿Cuáles son los textos, discursos y prácticas que las caracterizan? ¿Cuáles son las formas de textualidad depositadas por estos discursos y prácticas? Y ¿cómo se desarrollan los procesos de traducción entre una semiosfera y otra?

2) COMIDA E IDENTIDAD RELIGIOSA. La esfera alimentaria es de fundamental importancia en relación a la identidad religiosa: desde las prescripciones alimentarias hasta las ofrendas de alimentos a los dioses, de la hostia eucarística al yajña védico, de los períodos en ayunas a los episodios narrados por los textos sagrados, la religión está llena de signos, textos y prácticas en las que la alimentación juega un papel crucial. De qué manera la materia-comida surge como signo religioso? ¿Cuáles son los rituales y las prácticas que acompañan a esta transformación? ¿Cuáles son los efectos de sentido que ésta aporta? Y ¿cómo puede la semiótica dar cuenta de estos procesos?

3) La comida entre lenguaje y comunicación. La cocina y la alimentación han sido a menudo comparadas con el lenguaje y la comunicación: es cierto que, desde una perspectiva antropológica, la nutrición representa una de las primeras necesidades de la humanidad; sin embargo, también lo es que, una vez satisfecha, esta necesidad se estructura en un sistema de diferencias significativas. ¿Cuáles son las características propias de este lenguaje? ¿Cuáles son sus formas de expresión? ¿Qué cambios han sufrido estos aspectos a través del tiempo y qué configuración han llegado a asumir en la época contemporánea, caracterizada por numerosos flujos migratorios y por la aparición de la así llamada globalización de los alimentos? Mucho puede decir, por otra parte, el análisis de los lenguajes y formas de comunicación que están relacionados con el universo alimentario: del cine a las distintas formas de arte, de las degustaciones enogastronómicas a los blogs de cocina, de la fotografía a la moda, la comida está en el centro de muchos discursos que la analizan y cuentan, invirtiéndola de múltiples valores e introduciéndola en programas narrativos multiformes. ¿Cuáles son las trazas dejadas por dichos discursos? Y ¿de qué manera estos afectan nuestra percepción de la realidad? ¿Cuál es, finalmente, el potencial de los medios de comunicación en relación a la representación de la comida y el gusto — y, en particular, de su dimensión cultural?

 

Estas tres áreas de reflexión están abiertas no sólo a todas las perspectivas semióticas, sino también a las contribuciones de otras disciplinas como la antropología, la sociología y los estudios de alimentación. En particular, se apreciarán las contribuciones que logren combinar una reflexión teórico-metodológica profundizada (¿de qué manera la semiótica puede interactuar con estas disciplinas para facilitar el análisis de las cuestiones antes mencionadas?) con una aplicación analítica rigurosa y heurística basada en estudios de caso precisos y bien detallados.

 

 

Here is the expected publication schedule of the volume:

Questo è il calendario previsto per la pubblicazione del volume:

Voici le calendrier prévu pour la publication du volume:

Éste es el calendario previsto para la publicación del volumen:

 

December 15, 2014: deadline for contributions

January 15, 2015: deadline for referees

March 15, 2015: deadline for revised versions of contributions

June 15, 2015: publication of Lexia n. 14.

15 dicembre 2014: deadline per i contributi

15 gennaio 2015: deadline per i revisori

15 marzo 2015: deadline per le versioni rielaborate dei contributi

15 giugno 2015: pubblicazione di Lexia n. 14

15 décembre 2014: date limite pour les articles

15 janvier 2015: date limite pour les réviseurs

15 mars 2015: date limite pour les versions révisées des contributions

15 juin 2015: publication de Lexia n. 11

15 diciembre 2014: fecha límite para los artículos

15 enero 2015: fecha límite para los revisores

15 marzo 2015: fecha límite para las revisiones de los artículos

15 junio 2015: publicación de Lexia n. 11

 

Contributions, 30,000 characters max, MLA stylesheet, with a 500 words max English abstract and 5 English key-words, should be sent to simona.stano@gmail.com

I contributi, max 30.000 battute, foglio di stile MLA, con un abstract in inglese di 500 parole max e 5 parole chiave in Inglese, dovranno essere inviati a simona.stano@gmail.com

Les articles, 30.000 frappes max, feuille de style MLA, avec un résumé en anglais de 500 mots max et 5 mots-clé en anglais, devront être envoyées à simona.stano@gmail.com

Los artículos, 30.000 caracteres max, hoja de estilo MLA, con un resumen en inglés de 500 palabras max y 5 palabras-llave en inglés, deberán ser enviadas a simona.stano@gmail.com

 

Languages/lingue/langues/lenguas: English, Italiano, Français, Español [other languages if reviewers are available]

Published new issue 15-16 of Lexia Journal of Semiotics

Lexia 15-16 - Ecstasy - Presentation Materials 1

Download presentation-PDF: Lexia 15-16 – Ecstasy – Presentation Materials

Estasi

Ecstasy
È estatico ogni discorso che, costruendosi nel linguaggio e col linguaggio, rappresenta nondimeno una fuoriuscita da esso, un bloccarsi della semiosi, un venir meno delle distinzioni che fondano il senso. Trattasi dunque di un’impostura? Dell’evocazione impossibile, fra le maglie dell’immanenza, di una dimensione trascendente nella quale e verso la quale la prima si sfaldi, perdendo la consistenza di strutture e opposizioni? Rispondere affermativamente sarebbe forse semplicistico, sarebbe considerare l’estasi come puro effetto ottico, come sorta di trompe-l’oeil mistico.

In realtà, come ogni trompe-l’oeil, anche l’estasi rimanda a qualcosa di più della propria semplice rappresentazione. Essa rinvia ai pregiudizi inconfessati di un’ideologia semiotica, alla trama nascosta, al negativo segreto che regge tutta la concezione moderna del senso e del linguaggio. Il discorso mistico, che corre parallelo e invisibile, spesso represso, a volte perseguitato, lungo tutta la storia delle religioni, esprime allora questo dubbio: e se il senso non fosse distinzione, separatezza, dualità? Se l’immanenza articolatoria che lo viviseziona non fosse che illusoria? A questo punta ogni racconto dell’estasi: al sospetto che i fondamenti della modernità, antimistici per definizione, non siano altro che una delle possibilità dell’umano, e che una storia non detta, in filigrana, si dipani accanto e sotto al moderno come traccia sbiadita di un altro percorso, di un altro modo d’intendere e di dire.

Contributi di / Contributions by Mohamed Bernoussi, Ludmila Boutchilina-Nesselrode, Gérard Chandès, Eleonora Chiais, Alessandra Chiàppori, Daniel F. Cortés, Gian Marco De Maria, Yunhee Lee, Massimo Leone, Jia Peng, Hamid Reza Shairi, María Luisa Solís Zepeda,
Simona Stano, Federica Turco, Ugo Volli, Xingzhi Zhao, Francesco Zucconi.
In copertina / Cover
Parviz Tanavoli, Heech Orange 56, collezione privata.

4th issue of the Southern Semiotic Review Jornal

SSR_v1The fourth issue of this journal is published and can be seen as www.southernsemioticreview.net

The  journal welcomes papers with general semiotic methodology and subject matter, as well as ones with special themes. Current themes include media and social video, religion, memory and performance in particular dance and gesture.  As well as peer-reviewed papers, less formal reviews, commentaries and work in progress are welcome from international scholars and writers. Where possible, faster publication schedules for individual papers will be encouraged. The journal  mixes the need for archival services as well as scheduled issues. This journal has online and print versions.

The American Journal of Semiotics Vol. 30, Issue 1/2, 2014

ajs

The American Journal of Semiotics

Volume 30, Issue 1/2, 2014
Peirce and the Cenoscopic Science of Signs

John Deely (editor-in-chief) and Christopher Morrissey (editor)

 

 

Articles
1.Priscila Borges, Experience and Cognition in Peirce’s Semiotics

2. Garnet C. Butchart, Haunting Past Images: On the 2006 Documentary Film Description of a Memory in the Context of Communicology

3. Gilad Elbom, Glossematic Narratives; Or, Superfluous Information of Little Consequence: A Semiotic Approach to Literary Uselessness

4. Lars Elleström, Material and Mental Representation: Peirce Adapted to the Study of Media and Arts

5.  Richard L. Lanigan, Charles S. Peirce on Phenomenology: Communicology, Codes, and Messages; or, Phenomenology, Synechism, and Fallibilism

6. Donna E. West, Peirce’s Matrix of Individuation: The Work of Pronouns in Attentional Phenomena

Review Essay
7. Donald R. Frohlich, Biology, Peirce, and Biosemiotics: Commentaires ‘Cénoscopic’ d’un Biologiste

8. About the Authors

CFP: Cygne noir – revue d’exploration sémiotique

header_origamiCYGNE NOIR

revue d’exploration sémiotique

 http://revuecygnenoir.org/contenu/appel-a-contribution

Appel à contribution

Sémiotique des mystères

Le samedi 8 mars 2014, un avion de ligne de la Malaysia Airlines disparaît en plein vol, et ses 239 passagers enregistrés avec lui. Qu’est-il advenu du vol MH370? En l’absence de réponse, rapidement, les médias proposent des pistes. Le 14 mars, Le Monde avance six hypothèses : l’avion a-t-il continué sa route? peut-il avoir été détourné? l’avion peut-il avoir explosé en plein vol? l’appareil a-t-il subi une défaillance technique? la thèse du suicide du pilote est-elle réaliste? l’hypothèse d’une frappe d’un missile est-elle crédible? Le gouvernement malaisien finit par annoncer le 24 mars « qu’il faut considérer, selon toute vraisemblance, que le vol MH370 a été perdu et qu’aucun de ses occupants n’a survécu ». Entre temps (et encore après), la couverture médiatique aura laissé place à diverses stratégies rhétoriques afin de traiter de ce sujet dont on ne sait rien (ou presque) et qui demeure encore à ce jour irrésolu. Une disparition, une absence d’information, un mystère pour qui mène l’enquête et veut révéler les dessous d’une affaire, forcent l’abduction, précipitent l’hypothèse, mais imposent aussi l’allusion, la circonvolution, voire la métaphore, à défaut de quoi l’amphigouri se présente comme la seule option. Mais mystère n’est pas faribole : toute la difficulté énonciative repose ainsi sur la méconnaissance du contexte, l’absence du référent, les liens diffus qui unissent les signes aux phénomènes ou l’accès restreint à ceux-ci.

Du mystère originel au fait divers inexpliqué ; des cultes à mystères tels qu’ils ont été pratiqués un peu partout dans le monde gréco-romain au cours de l’Antiquité jusqu’au mystère de la Foi dans la théologie chrétienne ; du mystère entourant la mort d’Edgar Allan Poe au Mystère de la chambre jaune de Gaston Leroux ; chacun de ces types nourrit la polysémie du concept et augmente son ambiguïté. Secret, énigme, culte, complot ; mais aussi vérité, révélation, représentation, allégorie, symbole : tous ces termes se commutent et se complètent, forgent un terreau d’investigation théorique fertile. Le paradigme indiciaire (Ginzburg) et la « méthode du détective » (Eco) montrent également que la sémiotique peut servir l’enquête de manière féconde. S’il est vrai que, suivant le proverbe médiéval, la lumière montre l’ombre et la vérité le mystère, alors peut-être le fonctionnement du signe tel qu’il est défini dans ses diverses acceptions sémiotiques constitue-t-il l’hypotypose même du mystère.

Nous sollicitons des propositions qui sachent tirer profit de cette thématique afin d’approfondir des aspects théoriques de la pensée sur le signe et l’histoire de son développement et/ou qui proposent l’abord sémiotique de tout objet lié au mystère, dans quelque acception que ce soit. Les propositions favorisées 1) contribueront à l’avancement de la théorie sémiotique ; 2) seront à jour en ce qui a trait aux théories, méthodes et données ; 3) feront la démonstration d’une compréhension – et référeront à – des travaux existants dans le domaine traité. Celles-ci pourront s’inscrire dans l’un ou plusieurs des champs suivants : la sémiotique théorique (épistémologie, études culturelles, sémiotique cognitive, biosémiotique, etc.), la sémiotique appliquée (arts, médias, rhétorique, religions, urbanisme, traduction, éducation, etc.), et peuvent également préconiser une approche in-ter-trans-disciplinaire (anthropologie, philosophie, sociologie, psychologie, esthétique, linguistique, communication, etc.).

 

Candidatures

Les propositions seront reçues par courrier électronique à l’adresse de la revueredaction@revuecygnenoir.org au plus tard le 1er juin 2014. Veuillez indiquer en objet de votre message : « Proposition mystère ».

 

Votre proposition doit comporter:

1. un titre et un court résumé (500 mots maximum);

2. une courte notice biographique (250 mots maximum) incluant les informations suivantes : votre nom complet, votre statut, votre établissement de rattachement et votre département (s’il y a lieu) ainsi que vos coordonnées (adresse courriel au minimum).

 

Calendrier

Les propositions (titre et court résumé) seront reçues avant le 1er juin 2014.

L’acceptation des contributions sera notifiée au plus tard le 15 juin 2014.

Le texte de l’article, déposé aux fins de l’évaluation, sera reçu avant le 15 août 2014.

Southern Semiotic Review Issue 3 and Call for Papers

SSR_v1SOUTHERN SEMIOTIC REVIEW – Issue 3 (2014) now available at

www.southernsemioticreview.net

This  journal welcomes papers with general semiotic methodology and subject matter, as well as ones with special themes. Current themes include media and video, religion, memory and performance and visual arts.  As well as peer-reviewed papers, less formal reviews, commentaries and work in progress are welcome from international scholars and writers. Where possible, faster publication schedules for individual papers will be encouraged. The journal plans to  mix the need for archival services as well as scheduled issues. This journal has online and print versions.

Issue 3 2014

o    Issue Three Introduction

o    Comparative Literature in the Digital Age: Semiotic and Cultural Implications by Asun López-Varela

o    Transfer operations and intersemiotic translation in Alex Robinson’s London by Remo Gramigna

o    Rapunzel, Benjamin Button and Little Red Riding Hood: philosophical, rhetorical and textual semiotic excursions by George Rossolatos

o    How Vision Collaborates with Thought to bring Information into the Mind by Inesa Sahakyan

o    Of Criminals and Queers: Discourses of Class and the Outlaw in The White Tiger and Funny Boy by Adam A. Ferguson

o    The Emergence of ‘Atomodoxy’ in Cold-War Rhetoric and Science Fiction Narratives by James Eric Black

o    À partir de Greimas. Semiotic and Communication Patterns in Dance by Nicoleta Popa Blanariu

o    The View Finder: The Camera as Significal Pedagogue by Jude Chua Soo Men

o    Book Review: Bruno Latour. Rejoicing – or the Torments of Religious Speech, by Rowan MacKay

 

Call to Papers

Contributions are welcome for forthcoming general issues. In addition to ongoing general papers and issues, SSR will invites papers on continuing and special themes. General and special issues will be published online and in print as a quantum of quality papers becomes available. Papers or abstracts will be accepted at any time. Theme papers can be published in general issues before being assembled in special edition(s). 

The Semiosis of Transmedia
Guest Editors: Asun LópezVarela,  Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain
David Marshall,  Head, School of Communication and Creative Arts, Deakin University, Australia

Memory: Memory as a Representational Phenomenon
Guest Editor: Donna West

 Signs and Wonder – A Semiotics of Theology
Guest Editor: Demelza Martin, University of New South Wales,  Australia

A special supplement to the Southern Semiotic Review, called Sign|Artes, will soon be assembled. This will focus on creative arts and, in particular, visual and performance arts. Reviews, commentaries as well as papers are welcome now. The supplement will first be published by May 2014, and will be updated on a regular basis. Special editors will be Nicoleta Popa Blanariu, Veronica Devalle, Janys Hayes and Geoffrey Sykes, with assistance as required by other editorial advisors.

 

semiotic readerPrint publication

A print edition of Issues 1 and 2, titled “A Semiotic Reader”, is available through Amazon under “Southern Semiotic Reader”.

http://www.amazon.com/Semiotic-Reader-Papers-Southern-Review/dp/1493531549/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1393549734&sr=1-1

%d bloggers like this: